# Composio vs Browser Use: license, pricing and features compared (October 2026)

Canonical: https://theagenticweekly.com/compare/composio-vs-browser-use · Last verified: 2026-10-26 · Published: 2026-10-25 · Author: Agentic Weekly (operated independently from Texas, US) · Evidence: Evidence: Reported for both tools. The facts in the tables were read from each vendor's own pages and the public GitHub API on 2026-10-25 (America/Chicago). The What we measured section says what we have not run yet; anything we could not confirm is marked as not captured.

**Our pick:** Pick Composio for agent builders who need many app integrations with managed auth; pick Browser Use for developers building browser-driving agents. No overall winner: we have not benchmarked them against each other. **Updated:** 2026-10-26 (America/Chicago).

> Composio and Browser Use are both listed under Agent building. Pricing model: Composio is "Freemium"; Browser Use is "Pay as you go". License: Composio is MIT (SDKs, per GitHub); Browser Use is MIT. Composio is the better fit for: agent builders who need many app integrations with managed auth. Browser Use is the better fit for: developers building browser-driving agents. Facts were read from vendor and GitHub pages on Oct 25, 2026 and are Reported; what we ran ourselves is under What we measured.

## What we measured

We have not run either Composio or Browser Use ourselves yet, so nothing on this page is Tested; it is Reported from vendor and GitHub pages. Below is what we will run, so the comparison can rest on our own results.

Table: Our own tests for Composio and Browser Use

| Test | Composio | Browser Use |
|---|---|---|
| Hands-on test log (install and a real task) | Not tested yet. What we will run: install, then the same one-tool agent task five times, with install time and pass rate. | Not tested yet. What we will run: install, then the same one-tool agent task five times, with install time and pass rate. |

How we test and label results: [methodology](https://theagenticweekly.com/methodology#testing-rig). All test logs: [test hub](https://theagenticweekly.com/tests).

## Composio vs Browser Use at a glance

Composio and Browser Use are both listed under Agent building. Composio: Managed tool-calling and authentication for agents across 1,500+ apps, with a free tier of 100,000 tool calls a month. Browser Use: Open-source library that lets AI agents drive a browser, with a pay-as-you-go cloud browser starting at $0.02 an hour.

Table: Composio and Browser Use side by side (vendor pages and GitHub, 2026-10-25)

|  | Composio | Browser Use |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Composio | Browser Use |
| Listed under | Agent building | Agent building |
| License | MIT (SDKs, per GitHub) | MIT |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Pay as you go |
| Free tier | Free: 100,000 tool calls and 50,000 triggers per month, no card | Free starting credit; no subscription |
| Paid plans | $29 per month with $29 usage credit; $0.0003 per tool call beyond free; Enterprise custom | Cloud browsers from $0.02 an hour; proxy data about $5 per GB; model tokens billed per model |
| Platforms | SDKs and hosted service | Python library and cloud API |
| Public repository | ComposioHQ/composio: 30,747 stars, last push Oct 26, 2026 UTC (GitHub API, Oct 25, 2026) | browser-use/browser-use: 119,131 stars, last push Oct 24, 2026 UTC (GitHub API, Oct 25, 2026) |
| Latest release we saw | Oct 23, 2026 | 0.13.13, Oct 15, 2026 |
| Evidence | Reported from vendor pages | Reported from vendor pages |

## How Composio and Browser Use differ

- Pricing model: Composio is "Freemium"; Browser Use is "Pay as you go".
- License: Composio is MIT (SDKs, per GitHub); Browser Use is MIT.
- GitHub stars on Oct 25, 2026: Browser Use 119,131 (browser-use/browser-use) vs Composio 30,747 (ComposioHQ/composio). Stars measure attention, not quality.
- Free tier: Composio: 100,000 tool calls and 50,000 triggers per month, no card. Browser Use: starting credit; no subscription.
- Plans and prices differ and are not like-for-like (credits, seats and usage limits vary), so we do not name a cheaper tool. The Paid plans row above quotes each vendor's plan list as read on Oct 25, 2026.

## Which should you pick?

- Pick Composio if: agent builders who need many app integrations with managed auth. Skip it if: you need only one or two APIs.
- Pick Browser Use if: developers building browser-driving agents. Skip it if: you need a simple scraper (consider Firecrawl).

## Strengths and limits

Table: Strengths and limits as listed on each tool page

|  | Composio | Browser Use |
|---|---|---|
| Strengths | Generous free tier; 1,500+ apps claimed on site | MIT library; Usage-based cloud |
| Limits | Hosted dependency for tool execution | Agent reliability depends on model and site |

## What we did not verify

- Composio: App count (vendor claim).
- Browser Use: Task success rates (not tested).
- Output quality, speed and reliability beyond the smoke tests listed under What we measured: not compared.

## FAQ

### Is Composio or Browser Use open source?

Composio: MIT (SDKs, per GitHub). Browser Use: MIT. Licenses come from each project's GitHub repository or the vendor's own pages, read Oct 25, 2026; read the license text itself before redistributing or building a competing service.

### Does Composio or Browser Use have a free plan?

Composio: Free: 100,000 tool calls and 50,000 triggers per month, no card. Browser Use: Free: starting credit; no subscription. Checked Oct 25, 2026; prices and limits change, so confirm on each vendor's page.

### Which was updated more recently, Composio or Browser Use?

Composio's newest release we saw is (Oct 23, 2026); Browser Use's is 0.13.13 (Oct 15, 2026). Read Oct 25, 2026 from the official release page or repository; a newer date is not a quality ranking.

### What is the main difference between Composio and Browser Use?

Pricing model: Composio is "Freemium"; Browser Use is "Pay as you go". License: Composio is MIT (SDKs, per GitHub); Browser Use is MIT.

## Sources

- [Composio](https://composio.dev/) (fetched 2026-10-25)
- [Composio pricing](https://composio.dev/pricing) (fetched 2026-10-25)
- [Composio repository (GitHub)](https://github.com/ComposioHQ/composio) (fetched 2026-10-25)
- [Browser Use](https://browser-use.com/) (fetched 2026-10-25)
- [Browser Use repository (GitHub)](https://github.com/browser-use/browser-use) (fetched 2026-10-25)

## Related

- [Composio facts and sources](https://theagenticweekly.com/tools/composio)
- [Browser Use facts and sources](https://theagenticweekly.com/tools/browser-use)
- [Alternatives to Browser Use](https://theagenticweekly.com/alternatives/browser-use)
- [Agent building: all tools we track](https://theagenticweekly.com/best/agent-building)
- [Composio vs Zapier](https://theagenticweekly.com/compare/composio-vs-zapier)
- [Pipedream vs Composio](https://theagenticweekly.com/compare/pipedream-vs-composio)
- [Firecrawl vs Browser Use](https://theagenticweekly.com/compare/firecrawl-vs-browser-use)
- [Browser Use vs Playwright MCP](https://theagenticweekly.com/compare/browser-use-vs-playwright-mcp)
- [Chrome DevTools MCP vs Browser Use](https://theagenticweekly.com/compare/chrome-devtools-mcp-vs-browser-use)

## Changelog

- 2026-10-25: First published. Facts read from vendor pages and the GitHub API on 2026-10-25.

## How to cite

Agentic Weekly, "Composio vs Browser Use: license, pricing and features compared (October 2026)", last updated 2026-10-26, https://theagenticweekly.com/compare/composio-vs-browser-use