Alternatives to AutoGen

12 alternatives to AutoGen that we cover: Semantic Kernel, CrewAI, LangGraph, Langflow, Botpress, Gumloop, Lindy, Microsoft Copilot Studio, Pydantic AI, Relevance AI, Voiceflow, Vercel AI SDK. The table shows the evidence behind each entry and whether its pricing has been verified.

By Agentic Weekly, operated independently from Texas, US · Last updated (America/Chicago) · How we work

AutoGen
Semantic KernelCrewAILangGraphLangflowBotpressGumloopLindyMicrosoft Copilot Studio
AutoGen alternatives: Semantic Kernel, CrewAI, LangGraph, Langflow, Botpress, Gumloop, Lindy, Microsoft Copilot Studio, Pydantic AI, Relevance AI, Voiceflow, Vercel AI SDK

AutoGen in brief

Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework; its README now says the project is in maintenance mode and points to Microsoft Agent Framework.

AutoGen's README says the project is no longer actively developed with new features, warns that without ongoing maintenance and security fixes vulnerabilities may remain unaddressed, and links an AutoGen to Microsoft Agent Framework migration guide. The latest release tag we saw is python-v0.7.5 from Sep 30, 2025.

What it does well: MIT-licensed code; Large community.

Where it falls short: Maintenance mode per its own README; Last release tag we saw is from Sep 2025; Our test was one small task on a local 3B model; it does not show behaviour with hosted models or larger jobs.

Latest version we cover: python-v0.7.5 (Sep 30, 2025). Vendor: Microsoft.

When to look beyond AutoGen

Skip AutoGen if:

Read the full AutoGen write-up →

When AutoGen is still the right pick

Stay with AutoGen if:

AutoGen: Official page, dated. Open-source library; costs come from the model APIs you call. Evidence: Tested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B)).

Before you switch, note what we could not verify about AutoGen:

See also all alternatives pages and side-by-side comparisons.

AutoGen and its alternatives at a glance

AutoGen and alternatives: evidence, pricing status, latest version and last verified date
ToolEvidencePricingLatest version we coverLast verified
AutoGenTested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B))Official page, datedpython-v0.7.5
Semantic KernelReported (not run by us)Official page, datedpython-1.45.0
CrewAITested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, not vendor models)Not verified1.15.30
LangGraphTested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B))Not verified1.2.17
LangflowTested (smoke test, 2026-10-26, no LLM involved)Partly verifiedn/a
BotpressReported (not run by us)Official page, datedn/a
GumloopReported (not run by us)Official page, datedn/a
LindyReported (not run by us)Official page, datedn/a
Microsoft Copilot StudioReported (not run by us)Not verifiedn/a
Pydantic AITested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B))Official page, datedn/a
Relevance AIReported (not run by us)Not verifiedn/a
VoiceflowReported (not run by us)Not verifiedn/a
Vercel AI SDKTested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B))Official page, datedn/a

Evidence labels: Reported means written from official sources; Tested means a small smoke test with its scope stated. See methodology. Pricing status shows how well we could verify prices; open each tool page for the note.

12 alternatives

MicrosoftReported

Semantic Kernel

Verdict: Microsoft's model-agnostic SDK for building AI agents; its README calls Microsoft Agent Framework the enterprise-ready successor.

Pick Semantic Kernel if: Existing .NET and Azure shops already on Semantic Kernel.

  • For agent building: neither Semantic Kernel nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Semantic Kernel is Free and open source; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Semantic Kernel: Free to self-host. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Semantic Kernel: .NET, Python and Java. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Semantic Kernel: MIT (per GitHub). AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.

AutoGen vs Semantic Kernel →

CrewAITested (smoke test)

CrewAI

Verdict: Reasonable if you like the crew-of-agents mental model; the memory and tool-loop fixes in this release are worth taking.

Pick CrewAI if: Developers who want role-based multi-agent flows; Teams that want a built-in eval command.

  • For agent building: CrewAI is #5, AutoGen is not ranked.
  • Latest release we cover: CrewAI 1.15.30 on Oct 23, 2026. AutoGen python-v0.7.5 on Sep 30, 2025.
  • Evidence: CrewAI: Tested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct, not vendor models). AutoGen: Tested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B)).
  • Strength: CrewAI: MIT license and a large GitHub following. AutoGen: MIT-licensed code.
  • Main caveat: CrewAI: Very fast release cadence (several versions per week). AutoGen: Maintenance mode per its own README.

AutoGen vs CrewAI →

LangChainTested (smoke test)

LangGraph

Verdict: A dependable foundation for stateful agents; this release is a routine fix, so only update if the RemoteGraph or recursion fixes affect you.

Pick LangGraph if: Developers who want explicit control over agent state and flow; Teams running long-lived, resumable agents.

  • For agent building: LangGraph is #3, AutoGen is not ranked.
  • Latest release we cover: LangGraph 1.2.17 on Oct 24, 2026. AutoGen python-v0.7.5 on Sep 30, 2025.
  • Evidence: LangGraph: Tested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B)). AutoGen: Tested (smoke test, 2026-10-25, local 3B model (Qwen2.5-3B)).
  • Strength: LangGraph: MIT license, large community. AutoGen: MIT-licensed code.
  • Main caveat: LangGraph: More concepts to learn than simpler SDKs. AutoGen: Maintenance mode per its own README.
LangflowTested (smoke test)

Langflow

Verdict: MIT-licensed visual builder for AI agents and MCP servers with a very large GitHub following.

Pick Langflow if: Visual prototyping of RAG and agents; Exposing flows as MCP servers.

  • For agent building: neither Langflow nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Langflow is Open source; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Langflow: Free to self-host. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Langflow: Self-hosted and desktop (details not read). AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Langflow: MIT (per GitHub). AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
BotpressReported

Botpress

Verdict: Customer-support AI agent platform with a free plan and conversation-based paid plans.

Pick Botpress if: Support teams wanting AI agents with per-conversation costs.

  • For agent building: neither Botpress nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Botpress is Freemium; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Botpress: Free: $0. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Botpress: Web. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Botpress: Proprietary. AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
GumloopReported

Gumloop

Verdict: Agent builder for teams; plans start at $37 per month with 20k included credits.

Pick Gumloop if: Teams letting non-engineers build agents with IT controls.

  • For agent building: neither Gumloop nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Gumloop is Paid (trial); AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Gumloop: Free trial. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Gumloop: Web. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Gumloop: Proprietary. AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
LindyReported

Lindy

Verdict: AI 'employee' builder that connects to your tools; Free plan with $50 in credits that last 7 days, then credit-based plans.

Pick Lindy if: Non-technical teams automating assistant-style work.

  • For agent building: neither Lindy nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Lindy is Free trial + credits; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Lindy: Free: $50 in credits that last 7 days. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Lindy: Web. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Lindy: Proprietary. AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
MicrosoftReported

Microsoft Copilot Studio

Verdict: Microsoft's platform for creating and managing custom agents, workflows and apps with no code.

Pick Microsoft Copilot Studio if: Microsoft 365 organizations building internal agents.

  • For agent building: neither Microsoft Copilot Studio nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Microsoft Copilot Studio is Not verified; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Microsoft Copilot Studio: Not captured. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Microsoft Copilot Studio: Web. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Microsoft Copilot Studio: Proprietary. AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
PydanticTested (smoke test)

Pydantic AI

Verdict: Python agent framework built on Pydantic types, covering agents, realtime voice, image generation and embeddings.

Pick Pydantic AI if: Python teams that value type safety and validation.

  • For agent building: neither Pydantic AI nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Pydantic AI is Free and open source; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Pydantic AI: Free to self-host. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Pydantic AI: Python. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Pydantic AI: MIT (per GitHub). AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
Relevance AIReported

Relevance AI

Verdict: Platform for specialist AI agents for sales, customer success, marketing and HR, with an embedded deployment team.

Pick Relevance AI if: Go-to-market teams wanting managed agent rollout.

  • For agent building: neither Relevance AI nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Relevance AI is Not verified; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Relevance AI: Not captured. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Relevance AI: Web. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Relevance AI: Proprietary. AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
VoiceflowReported

Voiceflow

Verdict: Platform for chat and voice AI agents for customer experience teams.

Pick Voiceflow if: CX teams building chat and voice agents.

  • For agent building: neither Voiceflow nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Voiceflow is Free trial; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Voiceflow: Free trial, no card. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Voiceflow: Web. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Voiceflow: Proprietary. AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.
VercelTested (smoke test)

Vercel AI SDK

Verdict: Vercel's TypeScript SDK that gives one API across many model providers, with streaming and agent helpers.

Pick Vercel AI SDK if: TypeScript and Next.js teams building chat or agent UIs.

  • For agent building: neither Vercel AI SDK nor AutoGen has an editorial rank in this category.
  • Pricing model: Vercel AI SDK is Free and open source; AutoGen is Free and open source.
  • Free tier: Vercel AI SDK: Free to self-host. AutoGen: Free to self-host.
  • Runs on: Vercel AI SDK: TypeScript / JavaScript. AutoGen: Python and .NET.
  • License: Vercel AI SDK: Apache-2.0 (per LICENSE file). AutoGen: MIT (code) and CC-BY-4.0 (docs), per GitHub.

FAQ

What are the best alternatives to AutoGen?

Semantic Kernel, CrewAI, LangGraph, Langflow, Botpress, Gumloop, Lindy, Microsoft Copilot Studio, Pydantic AI, Relevance AI, Voiceflow, Vercel AI SDK. Each is covered with a verdict on this site.

When should I use something other than AutoGen?

Skip AutoGen if: You are starting a new production project: Microsoft points to Agent Framework instead.