Reported News

Muse Ember: Meta's smallest model for agent work, at $0.10 per million input tokens

Muse Ember is Meta's smallest and cheapest Muse model, released Nov 9, 2026 as muse-ember-1.0 on the Meta Model API and in Muse Code. It costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, has a 1M-token context window, and Meta pitches it as the high-volume executor paired with Muse Wonder or Muse Spark.

Share on X
Changes reported
6
listed below, each from a source we read
We tested
Not tested yet
reported from sources; we did not run it ourselves
Gaps we flag
4
things we could not verify
Sources
3
2 primary, linked below

What changed

Changes the sources report, with the evidence status of each
#What the source saysStatus
01Meta released Muse Ember as muse-ember-1.0 on the Meta Model API and in Muse Code, priced at $0.10 per million input tokens, $0.004 per million cached input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens.Reported
02It has a 1,048,576-token context window and up to 524,288 output tokens, takes text, image, video, audio and PDF input, and supports the Responses, Chat Completions and Messages endpoints.Reported
03Meta says Ember matches Claude Haiku 5.5's best Artificial Analysis score at about a third of the cost; its own chart puts Ember at 35.8 for $0.136 per task against Haiku 5.5 at 36.2 for $0.411, with Ember costs marked as estimates.Reported
04In Meta's table at max reasoning, Ember scores 37.8 on AutomationBench-AA versus 13.9 for Haiku 5.5 and 20.2 for GPT-6 Luna, but trails Haiku on FrontierCode 2.0-AA (27.2 versus 34.9).Reported
05The docs say Ember accepts the same request body as Muse Spark, so switching is mostly a model ID change; it runs in Standard mode only, and requests over 200K input tokens are billed at higher long-context rates.Reported
06Meta says Ember is the first model trained using Muse Wonder Full and that its safety evaluations found it below the high-risk thresholds of its scaling framework.Reported

reported by the sourcemeasured or run by usnot verified

Primary source: Meta: Introducing Muse Ember. We are the fast, independent index; the vendor’s own page is the source of record for this release.

Who it matters for

Teams running agent harnesses with many small steps: sub-agent coding tasks, tool calls, request routing, and extraction over large batches of documents or images. Meta positions it as the cheap executor under a planner such as Muse Wonder or Muse Spark, so existing Muse Spark users can try it by changing the model ID.

If you mainly need hard single-shot coding, Meta's own table shows Claude Haiku 5.5 ahead on FrontierCode 2.0-AA, and every benchmark here is reported by Meta, not independently run.

In the source’s words

“it matches Haiku's best score at about a third of the cost and beats every Luna setting.”

“Muse Ember accepts the same request body as Muse Spark, so switching most examples is a model ID change.”

What we have not verified

  • We did not run this release ourselves.
  • All benchmark scores and cost-per-task figures are Meta's own reporting of Artificial Analysis and internal evaluations; the blog notes Ember costs in its chart are estimates at proposed pricing.
  • We did not check the long-context price tier for requests over 200K input tokens or the rate limits.
  • Partner quotes in the announcement (Box, Cline, Oracle, Cloudflare, You.com) were not checked with those companies.

This brief is Reported: written from the sources below, not from running the release ourselves.

Sources

Spotted an error? See our corrections policy or email the address on the contact page. Markdown version for agents: /news/meta-muse-ember.md

Want these briefs in your Google Top Stories? Add Agentic Weekly as a preferred source on Google.

Newsletter

The Weekly Verdict. Free, every Monday.

A free email every Monday: the week's few big AI releases, then 5 short use cases for the new models, each with a prompt you can paste.

Free. Double opt-in. One click to unsubscribe.