Composio vs Browser Use: license, pricing and features compared (October 2026)

Composio and Browser Use are both listed under Agent building. Pricing model: Composio is "Freemium"; Browser Use is "Pay as you go". License: Composio is MIT (SDKs, per GitHub); Browser Use is MIT. Composio is the better fit for: agent builders who need many app integrations with managed auth. Browser Use is the better fit for: developers building browser-driving agents. Facts were read from vendor and GitHub pages on Oct 25, 2026 and are Reported; what we ran ourselves is under What we measured.

Our pick: Pick Composio for agent builders who need many app integrations with managed auth; pick Browser Use for developers building browser-driving agents. No overall winner: we have not benchmarked them against each other. Updated Oct 26, 2026 (America/Chicago).

By Agentic Weekly, operated independently from Texas, US · Published Oct 25, 2026 · Last updated Oct 26, 2026 (America/Chicago) · How we work

Evidence: Reported for both tools. The facts in the tables were read from each vendor's own pages and the public GitHub API on 2026-10-25 (America/Chicago). The What we measured section says what we have not run yet; anything we could not confirm is marked as not captured.

Composio

Reported

Managed tool-calling and authentication for agents across 1,500+ apps, with a free tier of 100,000 tool calls a month.

Browser Use

Browser Use · 0.13.13

Reported

Open-source library that lets AI agents drive a browser, with a pay-as-you-go cloud browser starting at $0.02 an hour.

Side by side, from what we recorded

Each row compares one recorded fact for both tools. Rows are not weighted and nothing is added up into a score; the note under each row says what the marker means.

Evidence
Reported for Composio
Reported for Browser Use
Tested = we ran it (smoke test); Reported = we read official sources
GitHub stars
30,747 for Composio
119,131 (Browser Use is ahead on this row) for Browser Use
Attention, not quality. Read Oct 25, 2026 / Oct 25, 2026
Most recent release we saw
Oct 23, 2026 (Composio is ahead on this row) for Composio
Oct 15, 2026 for Browser Use
More recent = newer release date; says nothing about quality
Pricing we could verify
Verified from official page for Composio
Verified from official page for Browser Use
About our evidence only, not about the price
Steps in our setup guide
2 for Composio
2 for Browser Use
Counts our guide's steps, not difficulty
Sources we cite
3 for Composio
2 for Browser Use
How much we had to read; more is not better

A list of recorded differences, not a quality score or a ranking. We have not benchmarked these tools against each other; the smoke-test row links each tool's own log. How we label evidence.

What we measured

We have not run either Composio or Browser Use ourselves yet, so nothing on this page is Tested; it is Reported from vendor and GitHub pages. Below is what we will run, so the comparison can rest on our own results.

Our own tests for Composio and Browser Use
Test	Composio	Browser Use
Hands-on test log (install and a real task)	Not tested yet. What we will run: install, then the same one-tool agent task five times, with install time and pass rate.	Not tested yet. What we will run: install, then the same one-tool agent task five times, with install time and pass rate.

How we test and label results: methodology. All test logs: test hub.

Composio vs Browser Use at a glance

Composio and Browser Use are both listed under Agent building. Composio: Managed tool-calling and authentication for agents across 1,500+ apps, with a free tier of 100,000 tool calls a month. Browser Use: Open-source library that lets AI agents drive a browser, with a pay-as-you-go cloud browser starting at $0.02 an hour.

Composio and Browser Use side by side (vendor pages and GitHub, 2026-10-25)
Feature	Composio	Browser Use
Vendor	Composio	Browser Use
Listed under	Agent building	Agent building
License	MIT (SDKs, per GitHub)	MIT
Pricing model	Freemium	Pay as you go
Free tier	Free: 100,000 tool calls and 50,000 triggers per month, no card	Free starting credit; no subscription
Paid plans	$29 per month with $29 usage credit; $0.0003 per tool call beyond free; Enterprise custom	Cloud browsers from $0.02 an hour; proxy data about $5 per GB; model tokens billed per model
Platforms	SDKs and hosted service	Python library and cloud API
Public repository	ComposioHQ/composio: 30,747 stars, last push Oct 26, 2026 UTC (GitHub API, Oct 25, 2026)	browser-use/browser-use: 119,131 stars, last push Oct 24, 2026 UTC (GitHub API, Oct 25, 2026)
Latest release we saw	Oct 23, 2026	0.13.13, Oct 15, 2026
Evidence	Reported from vendor pages	Reported from vendor pages

How Composio and Browser Use differ

Pricing model: Composio is "Freemium"; Browser Use is "Pay as you go".
License: Composio is MIT (SDKs, per GitHub); Browser Use is MIT.
GitHub stars on Oct 25, 2026: Browser Use 119,131 (browser-use/browser-use) vs Composio 30,747 (ComposioHQ/composio). Stars measure attention, not quality.
Free tier: Composio: 100,000 tool calls and 50,000 triggers per month, no card. Browser Use: starting credit; no subscription.
Plans and prices differ and are not like-for-like (credits, seats and usage limits vary), so we do not name a cheaper tool. The Paid plans row above quotes each vendor's plan list as read on Oct 25, 2026.

Which should you pick?

Pick Composio if: agent builders who need many app integrations with managed auth. Skip it if: you need only one or two APIs.
Pick Browser Use if: developers building browser-driving agents. Skip it if: you need a simple scraper (consider Firecrawl).

Strengths and limits

Strengths and limits as listed on each tool page
Feature	Composio	Browser Use
Strengths	Generous free tier; 1,500+ apps claimed on site	MIT library; Usage-based cloud
Limits	Hosted dependency for tool execution	Agent reliability depends on model and site

What we did not verify

Composio: App count (vendor claim).
Browser Use: Task success rates (not tested).
Output quality, speed and reliability beyond the smoke tests listed under What we measured: not compared.

OpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra: a $1/$5 computer-use model, and what the launch post leaves out (Reported; first seen 2026-10-26 19:05 UTC)

FAQ

Is Composio or Browser Use open source?

Composio: MIT (SDKs, per GitHub). Browser Use: MIT. Licenses come from each project's GitHub repository or the vendor's own pages, read Oct 25, 2026; read the license text itself before redistributing or building a competing service.

Does Composio or Browser Use have a free plan?

Composio: Free: 100,000 tool calls and 50,000 triggers per month, no card. Browser Use: Free: starting credit; no subscription. Checked Oct 25, 2026; prices and limits change, so confirm on each vendor's page.

Which was updated more recently, Composio or Browser Use?

Composio's newest release we saw is (Oct 23, 2026); Browser Use's is 0.13.13 (Oct 15, 2026). Read Oct 25, 2026 from the official release page or repository; a newer date is not a quality ranking.

What is the main difference between Composio and Browser Use?

Pricing model: Composio is "Freemium"; Browser Use is "Pay as you go". License: Composio is MIT (SDKs, per GitHub); Browser Use is MIT.

Sources

Composio (fetched 2026-10-25)
Composio pricing (fetched 2026-10-25)
Composio repository (GitHub) (fetched 2026-10-25)
Browser Use (fetched 2026-10-25)
Browser Use repository (GitHub) (fetched 2026-10-25)

Page history

Oct 25, 2026: First published. Facts read from vendor pages and the GitHub API on 2026-10-25.

Markdown version for agents: /compare/composio-vs-browser-use.md

Get The Weekly Verdict, free

One email a week. Each release gets one call: update now, worth a look, or skip.
Every claim shows its evidence. Reported means we read the sources; Tested means we ran it, with the exact scope and the failures left in.
A free AI Tools Cheat Sheet (web page and printable PDF) lands in your inbox when you confirm.